Frank Lloyd wrong

The house our kids were raised in was the oldest house in Ingham Township. It had a shallow footing for the main walls and a separate cellar un-der the original part of the house. The footing was shal-low so the settlers could quick-ly build it in time for winter. The cellar was added later, the dirt carried up the stairs and out. It offered food storage and protection from Indians. The house was all chopped up into little rooms because it was a house made of five additions.

Even before we took out the red velvet wallpaper from the bathroom, we took out a wall between the kitchen and the middle room.

Famous architect, Frank Lloyd Wright, along with his mentor, Louis Sullivan invent-ed “Architectural Democracy.” Weird name, amazing results.

Wright said: “So, let's say that the spirit of democracy – freedom of the individual as an individual – took hold of the house as it then was, took off the attic and the porch, pulled out the basement, and made single spacious, harmonious unit of living room, dining room and kitchen...”

It seems like a single spa-cious place doesn't quite jibe with individual freedom. What if you wanted to listen to Cap-tain Beefheart and your wife wanted to play the piano? If you think of individual freedom as trampling all over someone else's life that would negate the whole idea.

I constantly hear of this or that person jeopardizing our democracy. I've said it before, I know. But there is a reason why our republic is constantly jeopardized by claims of de-mocracy. In a republic our property is safe; in a democra-cy it is up for a vote. And once the vote is in, individual freedom is subject to mob rule. Democracy enables people who want to gain without offering something in return. Democracy enables legalized theft.

Wright's reference to de-mocracy as facilitating freedom of individuals reminds me of the red velvet bathroom. Both of them make about as much sense as public funding for the Iowa Caucuses.

Conservatives and liberals alike defend our “first in the nation status.” They think we could do a better job of rob-bing the rest of the country if we preserve our unearned in-fluence on elections. Wow. What a thing to be proud of. But let's just pretend that the vote is important. The caucus system restricts voting. It ex-cludes people with jobs and other responsibilities because they have to be present to vote. And a government that struggles to come close to providing real value has, once again, proven inept this year.

What about the people who choose not to be a Democrat or a Republican? They should fund their own events. “Fund it yourselves” should be what we tell every politician. Now that would be individual free-dom.

The caucus system should go the way of red velvet wall-paper.

Any responses to The Alternative may be sent as a letter to the editor or to Fritz’s email address 4selfgovernment@gmail.com. His blog, www.alternativebyfritz.com, is now being updated regularly. It's diverse, like the universities claim to be.